i
¡Ya se encuentra abierta nuestra convocatoria para publicar en nuestro Volumen 81 Número 2!
La Revista de Derecho Económico invita a toda la comunidad académica, tanto nacional como internacional, a enviar sus artículos a nuestra página web, en la sección "Enviar artículo". El envío debe cumplir con las normas indicadas en la sección "Publique".
La convocatoria estará abierta, a modo referencial, hasta el 15 de octubre de 2024.
Cartel screening data as evidence under EU case law
Autores/as
-
Diego Montero Bastías
Abogado, Chile
https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9961-6044
Resumen
This work develops in-depth topics related to data screening as evidence in a cartel investigation under European Union case law. The analysis of these aspects concerning the use of screening results as evidence rests on the review of European
case law that allows one to shed some light on the principles that apply to these cases.
The first part of the paper analyses, the different methods of cartel detection in general terms. Subsequently, focusing specifically on data screening, the adoption of this method by competition agencies in various jurisdictions is examined. The review then focuses on the different categories and types of cartel screening documented in the field literature, as well as the several benefits and drawbacks in the use of this detection tool as identified by the doctrine. Finally, it examines the relevant European Union cases to build both a correct standard for the performance of the inspections when decisions are based on the results of data screening, and a determination of the proper assessment of the results to find an infringement under Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Palabras clave:
cartel, collusion, cartel detection, data screening, dawn raidsReferencias
* Abrantes-Metz, Rosa and Patrick Bajari (2010). “Screens for Conspiracies and Their Multiple Applications”. CPI Journal, 6 (2): 129-144. Available at https://tipg.link/NRfC.
* Abrantes-Metz, Rosa and Albert Metz (2018). “Can Machine Learning Aid in Cartel Detection?” CPI Antitrust Chronicle, July. Available at https://tipg.link/NRfF.
—. (2019). “The Future of Cartel Deterrence and Detection”. CPI Antitrust Chronicle, January. Available at https://tipg.link/NRfI.
* Abrantes-Metz, Rosa and Daniel Sokol (2012). “The lessons from Libor for detection and deterrence of cartel wrongdoing”. Harvard Business Law Review Online, 3: 10-16. Available at https://tipg.link/NRfK.
* Beth, Hannes and Oliver Gannon (2022). “Cartel screening-can competition authorities and corporations afford not to use big data to detect cartels?” Competition Law & Policy Debate, 7 (2): 77-88. Available at https://tipg.link/NRfh.
* Beth, Hannes and Thilo Reimers (2019). “Screening Methods for the Detection of Antitrust Infringements”. Compliance Business - Das Online-Magazin, 3. Available at https://tipg.link/NRfm.
* Contreras, Jorge, Anabel Kingma and Miroslava Scholten (2020). “Putting Dawn Raids under Control”. Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies (YARS), 13 (22): 145-168. Available at https://tipg.link/NRfn.
* Combe, Emmanuel, Constance Monnier and Renaud Legal (2008). “Cartels: The Probability of Getting Caught in the European Union”. Bruges European Economic Research Papers 12, European Economic Studies Department, College of Europe. Available at https://tipg.link/NRgg.
* De Cooman, Jerome (2023). “Outsmarting Pac-Man with Artificial Intelligence, or Why AI-Driven Cartel Screening Is Not a Silver Bullet”. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 14 (4): 186-202. Available at https://tipg.link/NRfu.
* Deng, Ai (2017). “Cartel detection and monitoring: A look forward”. Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, 5 (3): 488-500. Available at https://tipg.link/NRfy.
* European Commission (2023). DG COMP Statistics 2023. Available at https://tinyurl.com/y4puh476.
* Fazekas, Mihály, Isabelle Adam, Yuliia Kazmina, Zsombor Teremy, Bence Tóth, Isabela Rosario Villamil and Johannes Wachs (2022). “Public procurement cartels: A systematic testing of old and new screens”. Government Transparency Institute, working paper series: GTI-WP/2022:01. Available at https://tipg.link/NRg0.
* Harrington, Joseph (2006). “Behavioral screening and the detection of cartels”. European competition law annual 2006: Enforcement of Prohibition of Cartels, Hart Publishing. Available at https://tipg.link/NRg2.
* Harrington, Joseph and D. Imhof (2022). “Cartel Screening and Machine Learning”. Stanford Computational Antitrust, 2: 133-154. Available at https://tipg.link/NRg5.
* Hofmann, Herwig and Isabella Lorenzoni (2023). “Future Challenges for Automation in Competition Law Enforcement”. Stanford Computational Antitrust, 3: 36-54. Available at https://tipg.link/NRg7.
* Huber, Martin, David Imhof and Rieko Ishii (2022). “Transnational machine learning with screens for flagging bid-rigging cartels”. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 185 (3): 1074-1114. Available at https://tipg.link/NRgL.
* Imhof, David, Yavuz Karagök and Samuel Rutz (2018). “Screening for Bid Rigging—Does It Work?” Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 14 (2): 235-261. Available at https://tipg.link/NRgN.
* Jourdan, Jérémie and Henry Gafsen (2022). “Competition Law and Fundamental Rights: Survey of Recent Developments Concerning the Right to Good Administration, Dawn Raids, Legal Professional Privilege, and Other Procedural Rights”. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 13 (4): 304-318. Available at https://tipg.link/NRgP.
* Lianos, Ioannis (2021). “Computational competition law and economics - an inception report”. Hellenic Competition Commission and BRICS, Competition Law and Policy Centre. Available at https://tipg.link/NRgQ.
* Mena-Labarthe, Carlos (2015). “Mexican Experience in Screens for Bid-Rigging”, CPI Antitrust Chronicle, June. Available at https://tipg.link/NRgR.
* OECD (2006). Prosecuting cartels without direct evidence. Available at https://tinyurl.com/2tfs3xv3.
—. (2013). Ex officio cartel Investigations and the Use of Screens to Detect Cartels. Series Roundtables on Competition Policy 147. Available at https://tinyurl.com/bdfvpp6a.
—. (2017). Algorithms and Collusion: Competition Policy in the Digital Age. Available from: https://tinyurl.com/4e4xv43m.
—. (2022a). OECD Competition Trends 2022. Available at https://tinyurl.com/yuwssd3a.
—. (2022b). Data Screening Tools for Competition Investigations. Available at https://tinyurl.com/5y87dhc6.
—. (2024). OECD Competition Trends 2024. Available at https://tinyurl.com/mx2mt34u.
* Pachnou, Despina and Daniel Westrik (2023). Developments in Cartel Screening, CPI Columns, January. Available at https://tinyurl.com/bc4v6ybr.
* Ragazzo, Carlos (2012). Screens in the gas retail market: the Brazilian experience, CPI Columns, March. Available at https://tinyurl.com/ycy5cxzx.
* Schrepel, Thibault and Teodora Groza (2023). The Adoption of Computational Antitrust by Agencies: 2nd Annual Report. Stanford Computational Antitrust, 3: 55-157. Available at https://tipg.link/NRgT.
* Schrepel, Thibault (2021). “Computational Antitrust: An Introduction and Research Agenda”. Stanford Computational Antitrust, 1: 1-15. Available at https://tipg.link/NRgV.
Silveira, Douglas, Silvinha Vasconcelos, Paula Bogossian and Joaquim Neto (2021). “Cartel screening in the Brazilian fuel retail market”. EconomiA, 22 (1): 53-70. Available at https://tipg.link/NRgW.
Zlatcu, Iuliana and Marta-Christina Suciu (2017). “The role of economics in cartel detection: A review of cartel screens” Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 6 (3): 16-26. Available at https://tipg.link/NRgY.
